BLOG | articlesandblogslist

Irina Fain – ExNTER

Will Pastons
Nov 27
0 min read

Neurogeometry: How The Brain Uses Form To Build Perception

Will Pastons
Nov 26
4 min read

Written by Irina Fain in Prefrontal Edits

Modern neuroscience describes the brain through electrical activity, chemical gradients, networks, and computational models.

Geometry describes the world through structure, proportion, distance, curvature, and relation.

When these two languages meet, an entirely new understanding of human perception emerges:

the brain organizes reality as geometry.

Literally as spatial transformation, relational mapping, and shape recognition across neural circuits.

Every perception is a structured arrangement.

Every thought has coordinates.

Every emotion occupies patterned space.

Every identity stabilizes through geometry.

This chapter reveals how.

I. Neural Signal → Spatial Encoding

When a stimulus reaches the brain — sound, touch, light, temperature, movement — the nervous system converts it into spatial distinctions:

· amplitude

· intensity

· contrast

· orientation

· velocity

· proximity

These distinctions activate specific neural populations that behave like geometric filters.

In the visual cortex, neurons respond to:

· edges,

· contours,

· angles,

· curvature.

In the auditory cortex, neurons respond to:

· frequency gradients,

· temporal intervals.

In the somatosensory cortex:

· distances between touch points,

· direction of movement on skin,

· pressure distribution.

Perception begins as patterned space.

This is the first principle of neurogeometry.

II. Cortical Networks → Mapping Meaning

Once the initial spatial encoding arrives, the cortex constructs maps — grids of association that determine meaning.

These maps are dynamic.

They shift as experience accumulates.

Modern fMRI and network modeling show that the brain uses:

· adjacency networks,

· clustering,

· density fields,

· connectivity weights,

· spatial gradients,

· attractor dynamics.

All of these are geometric operations.

Instead of storing information as isolated facts, the brain arranges it as relational topology regions of meaning connected by pathways of relevance.

· Thought becomes location.

· Understanding becomes structure.

· Insight becomes reconfiguration.

This is the second principle of neurogeometry.

III. Emotion → A Coordinating Field

Emotion organizes the perceptual landscape into coherent configurations.

Neural systems involved:

· amygdala (salience)

· insula (interoception)

· anterior cingulate (integration)

· vmPFC (value mapping)

Emotion assigns direction, weight, and priority to perception:

· some elements increase in prominence,

· others recede,

· some merge into a single dominant impression.

In this architecture, emotion is equivalent to a force field that shapes the geometry of experience.

A change in feeling repositions the entire perceptual layout.

This is the third principle of neurogeometry.

IV. Prediction → Forward Geometry

The brain does not wait for events — it forecasts them.

Predictive processing research (Friston, Clark, Barrett) describes the brain as a prediction machine that continuously projects the next shape of experience.

Prediction is geometric:

· extending trajectories,

· estimating curvature in patterns,

· modeling the next configuration of social or physical events.

The brain uses past geometries to construct the next.

Identity stabilizes in these projections.

Selfhood becomes an anticipatory structure.

This is the fourth principle of neurogeometry.

V. Memory → Stored Arrangements

Memory preserves arrangements over raw experience: pattern of relationships, distribution of emotional weight, structure of meaning at the time of encoding. When a present event resembles the stored structure, the brain activates it by structural resonance — a match between the current geometry and the archived one.

This is why a smell from childhood expands instantly into a full memory: the geometry has been matched.

Memory behaves like shape recognition in a multidimensional field.

This is the fifth principle of neurogeometry.

VI. Imagination → Constructed Configurations

Imagination is the brain’s capability to generate alternative spatial arrangements:

· different outcomes,

· hypothetical scenarios,

· untested configurations,

· reorganized relational fields.

Neuroscience maps imagination to coordinated activity across:

· default mode network (internal modeling),

· prefrontal cortex (configuration),

· parietal cortex (spatial integration),

· limbic systems (value shaping).

These networks co-create conceptual spaces that feel vivid because they follow the same geometric principles as perception itself.

Imagination is the brain’s design studio.

This is the sixth principle of neurogeometry.

VII. Consciousness → A Continuous Reformatting of Inner Space

Consciousness emerges as the synthesis of:

· spatial encoding

· map formation

· emotional calibration

· predictive extension

· memory matching

· configuration generation

Together, these create a living geometry inside the mind.

A person’s worldview becomes the geometry they rely on most:

· some prefer linear, sequential structures

· others perceive through clusters

· some organize by emotional amplitude

· others by relational distance

· some navigate through conceptual topologies

· others through narrative continuity

Each is a valid architecture of consciousness.

The diversity of humanity is the diversity of cognitive geometry.

VIII. The Realization

· Perception is construction.

· Identity is fast recalibration.

· Emotion is integration.

· Memory is structural activation.

· Imagination is reconfiguration.

The human mind is a dynamic geometric processor, constantly organizing reality into patterns of stability and transformation.

· Neuroscience provides the mechanism.

· Geometry provides the language.

· Together, they reveal a truth:

The way a person perceives the world is the map of how their inner architecture takes shape.

Article Source: https://exnter.com/neurogeometry-how-the-brain-uses-form-to-build-perception/

Irina Fain - Under Multiple Lenses: A Kaleidoscopic Reading of a Psychotype

Will Pastons
Nov 15
4 min read

Category: Psycho-Correction

Author: Irina Fain

Tags: #IrinaFain #psychotype #psycho-correction #NLP #cognition #neuroscience #assessment

1 · The Value of Multi-Angle Typology

In psycho-correction, typology is not a label; it’s a diagnostic interface.

Every framework—MBTI, Enneagram, Big Five, Socionics, or NLP meta-programming—represents one facet of a larger cognitive architecture.

Looking through these systems is like rotating a kaleidoscope: each turn reframes the same structure with a different geometry of emphasis.

The goal isn’t to decide which is true but to see how each system captures part of the human algorithm.

2 · MBTI: The Cognitive Composition

Within the Myers–Briggs Type Indicator, INFP stands for Introverted, Intuitive, Feeling, Perceiving.

This combination translates into an internally referenced, abstract, affect-driven processing style.

Dominant Function: Introverted Feeling (Fi) — evaluates information against internal ethical consistency.
Auxiliary Function: Extraverted Intuition (Ne) — explores possibilities and abstract connections.
Tertiary/Inferior Functions: Sensing and Thinking — less preferred, emerging under stress or in structured environments.

From a corrective standpoint, the INFP system requires scaffolding around external structure and temporal continuity.

They interpret the world through values first, logic second. Therefore, interventions should translate cognitive structure into value-based language rather than procedural commands.

3 · Enneagram: Motivation and Defense

Under the Enneagram, INFPs often align with Type 4 (Individualist) or Type 9 (Peacemaker)—both driven by harmony, authenticity, and emotional resonance.

Where MBTI describes how cognition processes, the Enneagram explains why it persists in certain cycles.

Type 4 responds to perceived disconnection with self-intensification (“I must be unique to exist”).

Type 9 responds with adaptive merging (“I will dissolve conflict by adapting”).

In psycho-correction, understanding this motivational root directs the regulatory technique:

For Type 4-INFP → normalize emotional fluctuation and anchor meaning externally.
For Type 9-INFP → develop assertive boundaries and active self-definition.

4 · Big Five: The Statistical Backbone

The Big Five (OCEAN) model strips away typology and measures traits along dimensions:

High Openness (curiosity, imagination)
High Agreeableness (empathy, cooperation)
Low to Moderate Conscientiousness (difficulty with rigid structure)
High Neuroticism (sensitivity to affective change)
Introversion (preference for internal processing)

This trait-based lens provides measurable anchors for behavior modification.

In psycho-correction, it helps identify leverage points: raising conscientiousness through external cues, moderating neuroticism through regulation protocols, maintaining openness without diffusion.

5 · Socionics: Information Metabolism

Socionics, an Eastern-European model derived from Jung, describes information metabolism—the way a mind absorbs and transmits data.

INFP corresponds roughly to the EII (Ethical-Intuitive Introvert) or “Humanist” type.

EII structures reality through ethics (Fi) and abstraction (Ne), valuing moral coherence and conceptual integrity.

Socionics adds an interpersonal dimension: intertype compatibility—predicting friction or flow in team and relational settings.

From a corrective perspective, this allows for mapping interactional energy cost: which pairings drain versus stabilize the INFP system.

6 · NLP Meta-Programs: Cognitive Filters in Real Time

NLP reframes typology into meta-programs—patterns of attention and motivation observable in speech and behavior.

Common INFP configurations include:

Internal Reference (trusting inner feeling over external proof)
Options Orientation (preferring flexibility to fixed sequence)
Toward Motivation (seeking ideals rather than avoiding threats)
Global Processing (seeing patterns over details)

In psycho-correction, shifting one meta-program at a time often creates measurable behavioral change.

Example: training a “Procedures” frame introduces operational rhythm without suppressing creativity.

7 · Archetypes: Symbolic Mapping

In symbolic analysis, INFP often maps to the Healer / Visionary archetype—driven by restoration of coherence between inner and outer worlds.

Its shadow manifestation, the Martyr, appears when empathy is unbounded.

The archetypal model is useful in narrative reframing, helping clients contextualize inner conflict as a role misalignment rather than identity failure.

8 · The Kaleidoscope Model of Correction

Each psychotype system is a mirror fragment:

MBTI → cognition sequence
Enneagram → motivation pattern
Big Five → measurable traits
Socionics → interpersonal metabolism
NLP → perceptual strategy
Archetype → narrative identity

When rotated together, the pattern that persists is the person’s consistency across frameworks.

If all lenses indicate internal referencing, high openness, and value-based motivation, the system is stable in identity but flexible in expression.

Psycho-correction aims not to change the fragment but to align them into coherence—so perception, behavior, and self-image stop contradicting each other.

9 · Practical Application

Assessment: Begin with a cross-typological scan rather than a single test.
Mapping: Identify convergent traits—repeated patterns across systems.
Calibration: Design corrective strategies that support structure without negating individuality.
Feedback Loop: Reassess under new environmental variables; the kaleidoscope never freezes.

10 · Conclusion

The INFP profile, when viewed through multiple psychotype systems, illustrates how a personality is less a fixed identity than a dynamic algorithm of perception.

Psycho-correction is the process of aligning these perceptual codes into operational balance.

By rotating frameworks as one would rotate the lenses of a kaleidoscope, practitioners maintain precision without ideological bias—seeing not myth or label, but system coherence.